Page 248 - AGC_MultiLingue_HD.indd
P. 248
248 Responsible parties
Reference
title
BReeam europe: offices Criteria
Number of BReeam credits available
total BReeam credits achieved
fWaste
fffffffffVan Roey
WST 1
Construction site waste management
One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that a site waste man- agement plan has been developed and implemented.Two credits where evidence provided demonstrates that the first credit has been achieved and waste reduction is a key priority of the site waste management plan.Three credits where evidence provided demonstrates that a significant majority of non-hazardous construction waste generated by the development will be diverted from landfill and reused or recycled.
3
3
n/a
WST 2
Recycled aggregates
One credit where evidence provided demonstrates the significant use of recycled orsecondary aggregates in ‘high-grade’ building aggregate uses.
1
0
sai & Beai
WST 3
Recyclable waste storage
One credit where a central, dedicated space is provided for the storage of the building’s recyclable waste streams.
1
1
aGC
WST 5
Composting
One credit where evidence provided demonstrates there is a vessel on site for composting food waste, and adequate storage for such waste generated by the building’s users and operation. OR Where space or access is limited, there is a dedicated space for compostable food waste to be stored prior to removal and composting at an alternative site.
1
1
sai & Beai / aGC
WST 6
Floor finishes
One credit where carpets and other floor finishes are specified by the fu- ture occupant or, in tenanted areas of speculative buildings, where carpets or floor finishes are installed in a limited show area only.
1
1
LAND USE & ECOLOGY
fffffffffffn/a
LE 1
Reuse of land
One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that the majority of the footprint of the proposed development falls within the boundary of previ- ously developed land.
1
0
n/a
LE 2
Contaminated land
One credit is awarded where evidence provided demonstrates that the land used for the new development has, prior to development, been defined
as contaminated and where adequate remedial steps have been taken to decontaminate the site prior to construction.
1
0
erik dhont
LE 3
Ecological value
of site and protection of ecological features
One credit is awarded where evidence provided demonstrates that the construction zone is defined as land of low ecological value and all existing features of ecological value will be fully protected from damage during site preparation and construction works.
1
1
erik dhont
LE 4
Impact on site ecology
One credit where the design team (or client) has appointed a suitably qualified ecologist to advise and report on enhancing and protecting the ecological value of the site, and implemented the professional’s recom- mendations for general enhancement and protection of site ecology.Two credits where the change in ecological value of the site (x), as a result of development is less than zero and equal to, or less than minus nine species (-9 ≤ x < 0).Three credits where the change in ecological value of the site (x), as a result of development is equal to, or greater than zero and less than three species (0 ≤ x < 3). Four credits where the change in ecological value of the site (x), as a result of development is equal to, or greater than three and less than six species (3 ≤ x < 6).
5
5
erik dhont
LE 6
Long-term impact on biodiversity
One credit where the client has committed to achieving the mandatory requirements listed in the manual and at least 2 of the additional require- ments.Two credits where the client has committed to achieving the man- datory requirements listed in the manual and at least 4 of the additional requirements.
2
2
POLLUTION
Fti
POL 1
Refrigerant GWP - Building services
One credit where evidence provided demonstrates the use of refrigerants with a global warming potential (GWP) of less than 5 or where there are no refrigerants specified for use in building services.
1
0
Fti
POL 2
Preventing refrigerant leaks
One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that refrigerant leaks can be detected or where there are no refrigerants specified for the development. One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that the provision of automatic refrigerant pump down is made to a heat exchanger (or dedicated storage tanks) with isolation valves. Or where there are no refrigerants specified for the development.
2
1
Fti
POL 4
NOx emissions from heat- ing source
One credit where evidence provided demonstrates that the maximum dry NOx emissions from delivered space heating energy are ≤100 mg/kWh (at 0% excess O2).Two credits where evidence provided demonstrates that the maximum dry NOx emissions from delivered space heating energy are ≤70 mg/kWh (at 0% excess O2).Three credits where evidence provided demon- strates that the maximum dry NOx emissions from delivered space heating energy are ≤40 mg/kWh (at 0% excess O2).
3
2